Loading ORINEL…
Internal workflow we use to classify, respond to, and follow up on security and availability incidents. This is an outline of our process, not a guarantee of specific timelines or outcomes.
Last updated: March 2025
| Severity | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Active breach or full service outage | Confirmed unauthorized access to customer data; platform unavailable to all users |
| High | Significant security issue or major partial outage | Vulnerability under active exploitation; major feature unavailable |
| Medium | Isolated finding or limited degradation | Single-tenant issue; elevated error rates in one region |
| Low | Minor issue, no or limited customer impact | Non-sensitive config exposure; brief connectivity blip |
The following steps are used internally. Response times and ownership depend on team availability and severity.
Critical / High: The triage owner escalates immediately to the designated incident lead (on-call or engineering lead). If the incident lead is unavailable, escalate to the next defined backup. Critical incidents are escalated to leadership when customer data or full outage is confirmed. All escalations are logged with timestamp and reason.
Medium / Low: Handled within the team; escalate to incident lead if impact grows, if a customer is blocked, or if the fix requires cross-team coordination. Document escalation path in runbooks so on-call knows who to contact.
Critical / High: Affected customers are notified as soon as practicable after containment, with a brief description of the incident and impact. Updates are provided until the incident is resolved. A summary or post-incident report may be offered where appropriate.
Medium / Low: Communicated via status page or support as needed. Formal notification is used when customer data or contractual commitments (e.g. SLA) are affected.
Security researchers can report vulnerabilities via supportwith the subject line "Security – Responsible disclosure". Please include a description, steps to reproduce, and impact. We acknowledge reports and respond based on severity. We ask for reasonable time to address issues before public disclosure and do not pursue legal action against researchers who report in good faith.